Meeting GOD !!!

lemme start this by asking a question

" Whats the difference between u meeting god and god meeting you ??"

Before starting the discussion i would like to define "My GOD "..for me god is like a patient and loving father....like a gud father he loves his children and is willing to help them......wenever we r doing something wrong,he always expect us to repent and correct our mistake...

Lets comeback to our discussion....so how many times u have met god?

i will tell my experience....
we r willing to meet god only wen we r in some kind of trouble...we always pray to god to get things done,to get a gud appraisal,to go to onsite,to get leave,to resolve problems with GF/BF etc...

But is it correct?
how will u feel if one of your friends always come to you only for solving his problems ? But once it is solved he s no more in touch with u,he doesnt even say a thanks for helping him !! he doesnt call u for the party he gave to celebrate his sucess !!!

Wont u feel very bad...i think same will be situation with god..he will be very unhappy with this kind of behaviour from his children..

But as i described earlier god is our loving father ,so he s ready to help us again,he s ready to meet us again..he s eager to help/guide u in ur problems.everyday he looking for a chance to help u..tats wat i meant by god meeting u !!!

So friends, i think its the time to take a decision ...i will thank god each day ,each hour,each minute for giving me all these fortunes..this job,this group of friends, a supporting family,a gud GF/BF...

Am i an MCP???

hey ppl i dont have anything to write,but one of my best friend is bugging me to do this..so i decided i will write something.........

just kidding,to write something serious is very very difficult..,but to write something irritating is very easy !

just for those ppl who wanna comment on my blog i will write something(obviously irritating) :)) and tat too abt some debatable issues!!!

lets speak abt feminism....

......some of my friends call me a MCP(u dont know wat it is,u havent faced a feminist yet)........

lemme try to explain feminism - it is an exclusive luxury available only for women,through which they ask for equal voice/share in everything irrespective of whether they are competent enough or not !!

lets dig a little more into the topic..nowadays most of the people say that women should be given equal share in household decisions..but i got a slightly different view on this.i believe that no two person can take the same decision (am not saying about yes or no decisions)..

......well let me tell u onething peace prevails in a place where there s only one leader,when there s only one leader there wont be any confusions abt the policies, only one person will be taking the decision and everyone else helps to make it a sucess.....

.....so i think most of the problems will be solved in a family when there s only person to take the decision and make the move....well it s my selfishness and experience which says that it shud be the man who shud do it,in consideration with his partner..

u can comment ur views....

Revolt Quote's

Hey people around 5-6 months back,I found some interesting facts about elections…I thought I will share this with my friends !!!

Courtsey::Unknown friend who send me this mail::

This is about one section in the Conduct of Election Rules

Rule No. 49(O) in the Conduct of Election Rules 1961 says:
"Elector deciding not to vote - If an elector, after his electoral roll number has been duly entered in the register of voters in Form 17 A and has put his signature or thumb impression thereon as required under sub-rule (1) of rule 49L, decided not to record his vote, a remark to this effect shall be made against the said entry in Form 17A by the presiding officer, and the signature or thumb impression of the elector shall be obtained against such remark. "

Explanation:

In other words, a voter can go to the polling station and tell the presiding officer that he/she does not wish to cast her/his vote. The presiding officer will make a remark that the voter does not wish to vote and take the voter's signature against his/her name in the register of voters (Form 17A). At the end of the day, the presiding officer will, in totalling the number of votes cast, also include the number of electors who refused to cast their vote. By doing so, voters make it clear to all political parties that they are not satisfied with the kind of candidates put up by them. Though they have done their duty as citizens by going to the polling station, they have not found anyone on the ballot paper who deserves their vote. This is the Protest Vote.

If large numbers of citizens exercise their franchise in this manner, political parties will be forced to be far more careful in ensuring they do not nominate crooks and criminals or incompetents as their candidates next time round…..


And say out of 100 people only 40 people turn to vote and out of that the Candidate receives 30 votes. Then by rule, he's been declared as elected. But say, if out of the 100 people 70 turn to vote. And 30 people vote for the candidate and the other 40 people use section 49(0), to say i am not interested in any of the candidate. Then if, the candidates vote (which the vote he got i.e., 30) is less than the vote against him (under section 49(0) - which is 40), then by rule he would not be elected as winner and in turn he would not be able to participate in anymore further elections. And the election for CITY A will be re-held with fresh candidates. Now that sounds great handle for people!!